Kano Model
Understand which features delight users versus which are simply expected.
Definition
A technique for understanding which product features will help drive customer satisfaction.
Inputs
- Candidate features or requirements to evaluate
- Customer or user feedback, typically gathered through surveys pairing a "functional" and "dysfunctional" question for each feature
Outputs
- Each feature classified into a category — typically Basic (expected, dissatisfaction if missing), Performance (more is better, satisfaction scales linearly), Delighter (unexpected, drives strong satisfaction), or Indifferent (little impact either way)
- A prioritization lens based on customer satisfaction impact, not just effort or business value
When to Use
- Product or feature prioritization where customer satisfaction — not just functional necessity — needs to be understood
- Distinguishing table-stakes requirements from genuine differentiators
- Validating whether a proposed feature will actually move customer sentiment before investing in it
When Not to Use
- Internal-only systems with no end-customer satisfaction dimension to measure
- Early-stage requirements where there isn't yet a defined feature set to evaluate against users
See this technique in action with a free RequirementsHub workspace.
Start Free Workspace →